Protesters showed up in numbers to support three men accused of inciting violence during the recent demonstrations.
Tensions rose after supporters were denied access to court, triggering a bold breach of the perimeter fence.
The suspects didn’t appear in court as expected, with the hearing later moved to Kibera Law Courts without notice.
Rights groups have called the arrests a cover for state clampdown, while the DCI defends the charges.
Fence Climb Sparks a Statement
Outside the Milimani Law Courts, the mood was tense. Supporters of three detained protest figures, unable to get inside, grew restless. Then came the moment — a few scaled the court fence, raising fists and chants in the air as the crowd cheered them on.
Who Was in the Spotlight?
The three men at the centre of it all — John Mulingwa Nzau (Garang), Mark Amiani (Generali), and Francis Mwangi (Chebukati) — were picked up on June 28 while travelling towards the coast. Authorities say they were key players in fueling unrest through social media during the Gen Z-led protests.
Closed Doors, Rising Tension
By 9 a.m., many supporters and civil society reps were still locked outside. Court officers weren’t letting anyone in. “Comrades don’t wait for permission,” one protester yelled after clearing the fence. “We won’t be silenced.”
Where Are the Accused?
Inside, confusion deepened. The three accused never showed up. Their lawyer said no judge had been assigned — but later it emerged the hearing had been quietly shifted to Kibera Law Courts. Word of the switch lit up social media.
Anger Spills Over
For many, the move looked deliberate — a way to avoid public attention. Supporters quickly regrouped outside the Kibera courts, picking up their chants where they left off. Videos shared online showed a crowd undeterred, calling for fairness.
Civil Society: This Is Not Justice
Activists and legal observers weren’t convinced by the official line. They called the arrests a tactic to shut down protest voices. “This looks like punishment, not prosecution,” one advocate said.
DCI Defends Charges
Still, the Directorate of Criminal Investigations insists the suspects crossed legal lines. They maintain the men incited criminal acts and must be held accountable.
Bigger Picture
To many watching, this wasn’t just about one case. It felt like a test of how far the state is willing to go to suppress dissent. Whether it’s a courtroom or a street corner, the call for justice continues to grow louder.
Protesters showed up in numbers to support three men accused of inciting violence during the recent demonstrations.
Tensions rose after supporters were denied access to court, triggering a bold breach of the perimeter fence.
The suspects didn’t appear in court as expected, with the hearing later moved to Kibera Law Courts without notice.
Rights groups have called the arrests a cover for a state clampdown, while the DCI defends the charges.
Outside the Milimani Law Courts, the mood was tense. Supporters of three detained protest figures, unable to get inside, grew restless. Then came the moment — a few scaled the court fence, raising fists and chants in the air as the crowd cheered them on.
The three men at the centre of it all — John Mulingwa Nzau (Garang), Mark Amiani (Generali), and Francis Mwangi (Chebukati) — were picked up on June 28 while travelling towards the coast. Authorities say they were key players in fueling unrest through social media during the Gen Z-led protests.
By 9 a.m., many supporters and civil society reps were still locked outside. Court officers weren’t letting anyone in. “Comrades don’t wait for permission,” one protester yelled after clearing the fence. “We won’t be silenced.”
Inside, confusion deepened. The three accused never showed up. Their lawyer said no judge had been assigned — but later it emerged the hearing had been quietly shifted to Kibera Law Courts. Word of the switch lit up social media.
For many, the move looked deliberate — a way to avoid public attention. Supporters quickly regrouped outside the Kibera courts, picking up their chants where they left off. Videos shared online showed a crowd undeterred, calling for fairness.
Activists and legal observers weren’t convinced by the official line. They called the arrests a tactic to shut down protest voices. “This looks like punishment, not prosecution,” one advocate said.
Still, the Directorate of Criminal Investigations insists the suspects crossed legal lines. They maintain that the men incited criminal acts and must be held accountable.
To many watching, this wasn’t just about one case. It felt like a test of how far the state is willing to go to suppress dissent. Whether it’s a courtroom or a street corner, the call for justice continues to grow louder.
