- Gachagua-allied leaders want clarity on recent government deals.
- Dispute arises after claims the public seal was moved from the Attorney General to the Head of Public Service.
- Isaac Mwaura’s statement sparked confusion before he retracted it.
- Lawmakers now question the legality of contracts signed without the AG’s input.
- The Attorney General’s Office is yet to comment on the matter.
Some political leaders linked to former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua have raised alarm over the use of the public seal in recent government agreements. The leaders are demanding full details from the State, arguing that there could be hidden deals being made without following legal procedure.
Their concerns come after reports suggested that the seal—normally held by the Attorney General—may have been moved to the Office of the Head of Public Service. The seal is a critical symbol used to confirm official government agreements and ensure they pass legal checks.
Confusion, Retraction, and Legal Doubts
Government Spokesperson Isaac Mwaura first made the revelation, but later took back his words, saying the issue had been misunderstood due to a bill in Parliament. Even so, the damage was already done, with questions being asked about whether due process is still being followed.
Kiambu Senator Karungo Thang’wa expressed doubt over the legality of deals signed under the new setup. “The seal belongs with the Attorney General, who reads and understands the law before approving anything. Now if the President signs directly, will he read the law? Won’t he just stamp it?” he posed during a rally in Embu.
Manyatta MP Gitonga Mukunji said he will take the matter to Parliament. “We need to know who really holds the seal now. When did he get it, and how many deals has he stamped since?” Mukunji added, suggesting the changes could open doors for secret dealings that may harm the country.
The Office of the Attorney General has yet to make an official statement on the issue, as public pressure continues to build.
