Aston Lukoye
- Member of Parliament Otiende Amolo expressed disappointment and frustration over the passing of the Fuel VAT provision in the Finance Bill.
- Amolo emphasized the collective efforts made to oppose the measure, stating that they reasoned, opposed, and said no to the 16% VAT on fuel and gas.
- He also expressed opposition to the housing tax and the entire Finance Bill.
- Amolo acknowledged that despite their efforts, the provision was passed, indicating a sense of defeat.
In response to the passing of the controversial Fuel VAT provision in the Finance Bill, Member of Parliament Otiende Amolo has expressed his disappointment and frustration, emphasizing the collective efforts made to oppose the measure.
“We Reasoned, We Opposed, We Said No To 16% On Fuel & Gas! No To Housing Tax! No To The Bill! We’ll, They’ve Had Their Way! Let History Judge…” said Amolo in a strongly-worded statement following the decision.
Otiende Amolo reaction
The Finance Bill, which included the provision to implement a 16% Value Added Tax (VAT) on fuel and gas, has been a subject of intense debate and opposition among lawmakers and the public. Many argue that such a move would have a significant impact on the cost of living, particularly for ordinary citizens already burdened by the high cost of essential commodities.
Amolo’s statement reflects the sentiments of those who fought against the inclusion of the fuel VAT provision, highlighting the collective efforts made to challenge its implementation. The lawmaker asserts that reasoning and opposition were put forward, representing the concerns of the people.
Related Post: Why Passaris Voted Yes In House Levy
“We’ll, They’ve Had Their Way!” Amolo’s words signify a sense of disappointment and frustration at the outcome, implying that despite the efforts to resist the measure, it ultimately passed.
— Otiende Amollo, SC,MP, EBS (@OAmollo) June 22, 2023
The lawmaker’s reference to “Let History Judge…” suggests a belief that the consequences and impact of the decision will be judged by future generations. It implies that the repercussions of the fuel VAT implementation will be remembered and evaluated in the context of its effect on the economy, the public’s welfare, and the overall direction of the country.
