- Government Spokesperson Isaac Mwaura says new departments will improve service delivery.
-
Argues that there is no limit to the number of state departments.
-
Justifies creation of a Human Rights Department under the Attorney General’s office.
-
Public concern grows over increased government spending despite calls for austerity.
-
Seven new PS positions could cost taxpayers over Ksh.5.5 million per month.
Government Spokesperson Isaac Mwaura has defended President William Ruto’s move to establish seven new state departments, dismissing criticism over increased government spending.
Speaking during a radio interview on Tuesday, March 25, Mwaura argued that the additional departments were necessary to enhance efficiency in public service delivery.
“There is no set limit on the number of state departments in government. They are created based on the services the government intends to offer Kenyans,” Mwaura stated.
He further downplayed claims that the move contradicted previous promises to streamline government operations.
“If you look at the costs versus the services expected, this should be commended, not criticized. There was no promise to reduce the number of state departments,” he added.
Why More Departments?
Mwaura cited the creation of a Human Rights Department under the Attorney General’s office as an example of a necessary expansion.
“We now have a Human Rights Department to handle related issues. Judith Pereno has been assigned this docket, and I have personally worked with her before,” he explained.
Public Concern Over Government Spending
Despite Mwaura’s justification, the move has raised concerns among Kenyans, especially as the government faces pressure to cut costs.
Currently, each Principal Secretary (PS) earns Ksh 792,519 per month, meaning the seven new PSs will cost taxpayers over Ksh.. 5.5 million monthly. With additional staff, the expenditure is expected to rise significantly.
Critics argue that at a time when Kenyans are being urged to tighten their belts, the government should be leading by example instead of expanding its wage bill.
